Sign In Join 



Chrysler 300/300C

4893 messages,  Last post on Jun 14, 2009 at 10:28 PM

You are in the Chrysler 300/300C/300C SRT-8 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Chrysler 300, Sedan


Messages Page 396 of 490
1
...
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
...
490
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3950 of 4893
Tire pressure by jake4
Feb 04, 2005 (5:46 pm)
Reply
I have a 300C w Continental Self Sealing tires. On the tires it says: Maximum tire pressure 51 Lbs. It doesn't say what the optimum pressure is. The sticker on the car does not name that tire specifically but the size and suggests somewhere around 34 if I remember correctly. 2300 miles on my car in winter driving. Only problem is broken knob on the Nav system wh they w fix.
Very solid car. Fun to drive. Quiet if the Boston stereo isn't going full blast. Acceleration is outstanding. It even sounds as "bad" as it looks. It's too bad that some people get a lemon. Mine is no lemon. If mine were, I can understand how my thoughts and feelings would be jaded. I hope Chrysler "makes good" for people. They have called me three times to ask how things were, plus one mail in survey and two phone surveys. What can I say???
    Oh yea, I drove on salt covered roads and didn't wash it for a week. Today after the car wash I looked / touched the rims and their edges etc and saw no pitting that someone else complained about. Maybe they drove through an acid spill. A damp then dry cloth got rid of water spots.
#3951 of 4893
3.5 v6 by danoh
Feb 06, 2005 (9:04 am)
Reply
Hi
 
Does anyone have the 3.5 v6 ?? Is it adequate?
 
really dont need another hemi (Durango).
 
I know the hemi is nice, but this could be more of a commuter car - so i am going for gas mileage.
 
there seem to be plenty of V6's at the dealers, so I was hoping to get a little less than MRSP.
 
Thanks
 
Dan
#3952 of 4893
Re: 3.5 v6 [danoh] by hardhawk
Feb 06, 2005 (2:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: danoh (Feb 06, 2005 9:04 am)

The 3.5 V-6 is adequate for the car. You should be able to get it at invoice plus get the $1000 if you finance via Chrysler Financial.
#3953 of 4893
Re: 3.5 v6 [hardhawk] by snowy
Feb 07, 2005 (8:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: hardhawk (Feb 06, 2005 2:29 pm)

Join costco and get $500 over factory invoice, AND get the rebate.
 
I just got my 300C AWD via the Costco program and got it on that pricing basis, which was much better than any other dealer was willing to do for me.
 
I got the $1,000 rebate by borrowing the minimum required ($10K), but you can pay off the loan after 3 payments, so it's a pretty sweet deal.
#3954 of 4893
Re: 3.5 v6 [snowy] by bmwdoug
Feb 09, 2005 (7:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: snowy (Feb 07, 2005 8:11 am)

Are you saying you got a 300C for $500 over invoice? What state are you in?
#3955 of 4893
300C AWD Vs. A6 by bazohimba
Feb 11, 2005 (2:43 pm)
Reply
Mark, I was shocked to see you on this forum. Interestingly enough, I am very interested in the 300C AWD, only one of which I can locate on Chrysler's web page for a 50 mile radius! I've driven the 2wd C, and liked it. Missed the ease of manually directing the shifting similar to Audi's version, and felt the caster was different, as the wheel didn't return to straight after turning a corner. In all fairness, the car had almost NO fuel, a dirty windshield, and I didn't get far enough from the dealer to really be sure it was warm.
 
I will likely get out of my TT 3.2 DSG Roadster early, as the fun is overshadowed by the inconvenience of lack of storage, comfort for my spouses's tush, etc. I am actually disappointed I turned in my A6 early. I've put the car up on lease trader, but no action for a month. Probably because the payments for the next 14 months are about $770. Anyway, if the A6 has gone up that much, I'll probably go with the 300C, as the CTS seems small, and dated, and the STS seems too large, and way too expensive. Unfortunately, both the STS and 300C AWD are quite scarce now.
 
It's good to see your name again, as I haven't browsed the forums for over a year. I lost your email address when I had a crash a month or so ago. HA! Hell of a note!!
 
jk
#3956 of 4893
Glad you are back jk by markcincinnati
Feb 11, 2005 (7:00 pm)
Reply
Audi is still on my short list. But the 300C and the Acura RL and even the Infiniti M's cannot be overlooked. Even the upcoming Bimmer 3 and 5 AWD's merit consideration. Audi is no longer alone, that is.
 
The 300C AWD is quite the value -- and from reading, it is also quite the performer.
#3957 of 4893
Short list by bazohimba
Feb 12, 2005 (5:41 am)
Reply
It's funny how I got all excited when pricing out the A6 this morning. I've owned 5 911s, and don't remember that much excitement, considering luxury, appointments, performance, i.e., whole package!! Guess my old age is showing. I could keep the Audi on my short list, but may very well go with the 300C AWD.
 
jk
#3958 of 4893
H.I.D Headlights on 300 Touring by kroache
Feb 12, 2005 (2:43 pm)
Reply
Hi All,
 I have been reading through this complete forum after having purchased my 300 in Nov/2004. Excellent discussion about this terrific vehicle. Even though I purchased the 300 with most of the available options I wondered whether it might be possible to upgrade the headlight system from standard to the H.I.D system that is available on the 300C. Has anyone considered this option or know if this is something practical to consider.
Thanks to everyone for a terrific forum!
kroache
#3959 of 4893
I hope I will be corrected, but. . . by markcincinnati
Feb 13, 2005 (6:41 am)
Reply
. . .it would be cheaper to trade your current car in on another one with Xenons rather than try to retrofit them to your current car.
 
I do not know if this is LITERALLY true. However, I have been participating in these forms for years and years and whenever this question comes up, someone who knows the technical hurdles usually explains why this, although possible, is generally thought to be too expensive. Perhaps Chrysler has somehow managed to build this car in such a way that this is both possible and affordable.
 
Good luck.
 
I don't know if this feature was available or not, so this question is not meant to be impertinent: why would anyone get a brand new car without HID lights (if they were available)? If you have ever driven or ridden in a car with these lights, you certainly can attest to their efficacy -- heck, I'll go so far as to say, these lights could save your life.
 
But, while I'm on my soapbox, why would anyone get a car without ESP (or stability control) if such technology was available on the car one was considering buying? The cost of these two technological marvels is relatively low and the very fact that it is NOT an overstatement to claim these features could save your life would seem to compel new car buyers to demand these features.

Messages Page 396 of 490
1
...
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
...
490
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement