Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Lexus GS Lexus GS 300/GS 430
3068 messages, Last post on Sep 18, 2009 at 6:41 AM
You are in the Lexus GS Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
That is very true. If the current RL goes 9 years like the previous one, they'll be right back where they started from. Acura is also limted by not having a proper rwd platform for a flagship vehicle. A re-cast or lengthened RL won't play in the S-Class/LS/A8/7-Series arena. While I agree that Audi is in similar postion I think they have a better chance to grow once they get some more 2-door models and crossovers in the lineup, that and their styling which unlike Acura's does cause a reaction..whether good (A8) or bad (A6's grille). At least it is something to talk about, Acura's styling is still very much forgettable across to board, imo. Audis are too imo just as luxurious as any Mercedes, especially the A6 and A8, but they haven't matched BMW yet on the sport side. When they do it seems that they miss the right balance between ride and handling, per some recent roadtests of the A8 and new A6. I seem to read where the ride is either too soft of too hard. Acura seems to be content with the 25-40K market with one 50K car. We could be talking about a "problem" that Acura doesn't feel they have or see a need to address. Just a thought. M |
|
|
I am not ready to rub my hands together in anticipation to see the new GS sell in huge volumes. In the mid-size luxury sedan market, if customers want luxury, the E-Class is peerless with no other viable substitute. For a more sporty demeanor, the 5 Series reigns supreme. My reaction if the new GS repeats its predecessor's humiliating past would be as dismissing as a pro-skier on a bunny slope. Here, in West L.A., where there is an abundance of wealth and a premium placed upon style, it is not difficult to understand why there is a lack of Japanese luxury vehicles rolling along the Sunset Strip. With Mercedes' unbeatable cachet, advanced technology, and success in the horsepower battle, along with BMW's nonpareil driving dynamics and quality interiors, and the Range Rover as the unequivocal off-roading luxury SUV, why would any of Southern California's elite settle for something as bland as Lexus or as ugly as Infiniti? Mercedes and BMW are their cars of choice. And the uppercrust prefers brands like Bentley, Maybach, and Rolls-Ryce, which are actually owned by German luxury companies anyway. |
|
|
"BMW's nonpareil driving dynamics and quality interiors" Thats no longer true. It doesnt sound like the particular drivers your speaking of are concerned with sporty driving anyway, they are solely concerned with the badge on the front of the car, and continue to fork over $5-10K more for it. As for the US as a whole, it used to be much the same way around 15 years ago. Mercedes was invincible. Lexus showed them a thing or two. Guess who's the #1 seller now? I'll give you a hint, its not German.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: lexusguy (Jan 27, 2005 4:40 am) My wife owns a Lexus. No trouble and an absolute pleasure to have it serviced. (My extended family owns two other's with the same experience.) Back in 1989 or 1990 my father was choosing between the just introduced Lexus LS and an Infiniti Q. We drove both and at the time he was 100% Lexus and I was the opposite. I believe it was then that I realized that Lexus was emulating Mercedes and Infiniti was emulating BMW with their philosophy and products. I now find Lexus to be a more reliable and better valued Mercedes in a way. This is also why I am upset over the GS300awd engine being left behind by the E350/awd as well as its Japanese 3.5L GS counterpart, the RL/awd and the M/awd. Why not put your best foot forward Lexus?
|
|
|
Replying to: 00boxsters (Jan 27, 2005 5:57 am) Maybe they have when they the new avalon rolls into the dealerships next week. This would also solve your reliability issue with the E. I have an E for the MRS. but can't keep her out of my avalon, maybe it just seems that way since the E spends a lot of time in the shop. |
|
|
|
|
They are stubborn, don't care what Americans want in a luxury car, and build according to what parts/engines/platforms they have available. They are smart, but too smart for their own good. They think they know more than the buyer. Sure-fire way to underachieve. Infiniti's ceiling is the extent of the first (rotten) impression they made on the US market. Lexus doesn't sweat Infiniti, nor should they! They are Audi-esque (remember the Audi 5000 debacle). They can make great cars, but they are their own worst enemy. And even though I am no big fan of the new GS, it is LIGHT YEARS better-looking than the M. The way Nissan styles there cars just turns my stomach. They've had some stunning successes recently, but when they are bad, they are AWFUL! I'd rather be conservative than just rancid! They just throw darts at a board sometimes! You know what I wish Lexus would do. Split the company into subdivisions, with seperate marketing budgets, and seperate agendas and specs based off each other. Have the ES/LS as the luxury sedan clique. Have the GS/IS as a sports clique (and get the SC there QUICKLY). And Group the SUV's together, like they already have in last year's successful ad campaign. Then in a few years, market the Hybrid class together. And build that SUV from the '03 Auto show circuit! That was sweet! And big! It was bigger than a SRX, but just so elegant. That would be huge here! So in closing, Acura is a non factor. Infiniti is deadman walking (the G35 is the seeing-eye dog). Audi is a borne second-fiddle, and VW is dumbing it down. And once Lexus sharpens this sporting edge it's considering, and brings out the hybrids, this game is all over but the crying. DrFill |
|
|
Interesting post, my friend, but Lexus wont do it. "Lexus doesn't sweat Infiniti, nor should they!" "And build that SUV from the '03 Auto show circuit!" I assume you mean the LF-X? Those two statements seem to contradict each other. Lexus very much sweats Infiniti. Just glancing at the LF-X and its pretty obvious that it is aimed directly at the FX45. The G35 crushed the IS300, and now Lexus is remaking the IS to better compete with G35. Infiniti essentially made no impression on most of the American market until the G35 hit the press. I dont think they are worried about 3 people that might remember the M30 and J30. |
|
|
|
|
The next IS will have nothing in common with the G. It will look different, have a much smaller size, and a coupe is down the road. The G has been a great success, but isn't a class-altering success. The 3-series is STILL the benchmark, in sales and dynamics, and that is where Lexus is swinging. The LF-X is MUCH bigger than the FX, as I said, bigger than the Caddy SRX too (slightly). It wouldn't be a hardcore performer like the FX, it would be a larger RX with an edge to it. The FX is successful, but again, it is not THE CLASS, just one of many fine choices. The LF-X brings something new to that class, if it were built. It seems unlikely before '07. DrFill
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: callmedrfill (Jan 27, 2005 8:02 am) Tested are the M35, RL, 530i, A6 3.2, STS V6, S-Type 3.0, and NO GS300. Anyone wonder if Lexus wants to Avoid a direct comparison so soon? I won't give away the winner for those who are expecting this issue in the mail.
|
|
|
Replying to: 00boxsters (Jan 27, 2005 10:38 am) However, I thought the omission of the E class curious, and I wonder why MT didnt just wait until the GS debuts. People who are "pooh-poo"ing a particular vehicle from a particular competitor would be wise to check out the article. ~alpha |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2006 Lexus GS 300
2007 Lexus GS 430
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
