Sign In Join 



Lexus GS 300/GS 430

3068 messages,  Last post on Sep 18, 2009 at 6:41 AM

You are in the Lexus GS Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lexus GS 300, Lexus GS 430, Sedan


Messages Page 118 of 307
1
...
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
...
307
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1169 of 3068
Re: Lexus and Reliability [00boxsters] by cove148
Jan 27, 2005 (6:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: 00boxsters (Jan 27, 2005 5:57 am)

"Why not put your best foot forward Lexus"
 
Maybe they have when they the new avalon rolls into the dealerships next week. This would also solve your reliability issue with the E. I have an E for the MRS. but can't keep her out of my avalon, maybe it just seems that way since the E spends a lot of time in the shop.
#1170 of 3068
Acura/Honda is a non-factor! by callmedrfill
Jan 27, 2005 (6:12 am)
Reply
They are stubborn, don't care what Americans want in a luxury car, and build according to what parts/engines/platforms they have available.
 
   They are smart, but too smart for their own good. They think they know more than the buyer. Sure-fire way to underachieve.
    
   Infiniti's ceiling is the extent of the first (rotten) impression they made on the US market. Lexus doesn't sweat Infiniti, nor should they! They are Audi-esque (remember the Audi 5000 debacle). They can make great cars, but they are their own worst enemy.
 
   And even though I am no big fan of the new GS, it is LIGHT YEARS better-looking than the M. The way Nissan styles there cars just turns my stomach. They've had some stunning successes recently, but when they are bad, they are AWFUL!
I'd rather be conservative than just rancid! They just throw darts at a board sometimes!
 
   You know what I wish Lexus would do.
 
   Split the company into subdivisions, with seperate marketing budgets, and seperate agendas and specs based off each other. Have the ES/LS as the luxury sedan clique. Have the GS/IS as a sports clique (and get the SC there QUICKLY). And Group the SUV's together, like they already have in last year's successful ad campaign. Then in a few years, market the Hybrid class together.
 
   And build that SUV from the '03 Auto show circuit! That was sweet! And big! It was bigger than a SRX, but just so elegant. That would be huge here!
 
   So in closing, Acura is a non factor. Infiniti is deadman walking (the G35 is the seeing-eye dog). Audi is a borne second-fiddle, and VW is dumbing it down. And once Lexus sharpens this sporting edge it's considering, and brings out the hybrids, this game is all over but the crying.
 
   DrFill
#1171 of 3068
callmedrfill by lexusguy
Jan 27, 2005 (7:32 am)
Reply
Interesting post, my friend, but Lexus wont do it.
 
"Lexus doesn't sweat Infiniti, nor should they!"
 
"And build that SUV from the '03 Auto show circuit!"
 
I assume you mean the LF-X? Those two statements seem to contradict each other. Lexus very much sweats Infiniti. Just glancing at the LF-X and its pretty obvious that it is aimed directly at the FX45. The G35 crushed the IS300, and now Lexus is remaking the IS to better compete with G35. Infiniti essentially made no impression on most of the American market until the G35 hit the press. I dont think they are worried about 3 people that might remember the M30 and J30.
#1172 of 3068
I strongly disagree! by callmedrfill
Jan 27, 2005 (8:02 am)
Reply
The next IS will have nothing in common with the G. It will look different, have a much smaller size, and a coupe is down the road.
 
   The G has been a great success, but isn't a class-altering success. The 3-series is STILL the benchmark, in sales and dynamics, and that is where Lexus is swinging.
 
   The LF-X is MUCH bigger than the FX, as I said, bigger than the Caddy SRX too (slightly).
 
   It wouldn't be a hardcore performer like the FX, it would be a larger RX with an edge to it.
 
   The FX is successful, but again, it is not THE CLASS, just one of many fine choices. The LF-X brings something new to that class, if it were built. It seems unlikely before '07.
 
   DrFill
#1173 of 3068
March '05 Motortrend Issue by 00boxsters
Jan 27, 2005 (10:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: callmedrfill (Jan 27, 2005 8:02 am)

There is a "$45K luxo-sport sedans duke it out" article in this issue. Guess who is absent from the six tested? Lexus GS300
 
Tested are the M35, RL, 530i, A6 3.2, STS V6, S-Type 3.0, and NO GS300. Anyone wonder if Lexus wants to Avoid a direct comparison so soon?
 
I won't give away the winner for those who are expecting this issue in the mail.
#1174 of 3068
Re: March '05 Motortrend Issue [00boxsters] by alpha01
Jan 27, 2005 (1:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 00boxsters (Jan 27, 2005 10:38 am)

I thought it was a really well thought out, very enjoyable read. I dont think Lexus wanted to "avoid a direct comparison so soon", I think a representative model is simply not available yet with respect to the GS300... dont forget... this test would have had to occur at least 2 months ago for it to be published for the March issue.
 
However, I thought the omission of the E class curious, and I wonder why MT didnt just wait until the GS debuts.
 
People who are "pooh-poo"ing a particular vehicle from a particular competitor would be wise to check out the article.
 
~alpha
#1175 of 3068
Re: March '05 Motortrend Issue [00boxsters] by jrock65
Jan 27, 2005 (1:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 00boxsters (Jan 27, 2005 10:38 am)

We've been talking about that article in the "Luxury Performance Sedans" thread for the past 5 days.
 
I imagine no E320 because MB wanted to hold off until the E350 was ready.
 
As for why MT didn't wait, they probably just wanted to be the "first" to be out with a comparo in this new hot segment. They're competing for readers with C&D, R&T, and Automobile Mag.
#1176 of 3068
Luxo-Sport Comparo by bartalk2
Jan 27, 2005 (2:20 pm)
Reply
While the M35 is at the sport end of the luxo-sport continuum, the new GS300, like the current one, will probably continue at the luxo end.
#1177 of 3068
Lexus v. Infiniti? by chris65amg
Jan 27, 2005 (2:34 pm)
Reply
I can agree that the G35 crushes the IS300, but Lexus is planning to redesign the IS pretty darn soon....
 
Also, the LS crushed the Q, and the RX easily outsells the FX, and will to a greater extent when the hybrid version comes out.
 
Comparing Lexus and Infiniti is like comparing apples to oranges. If Toyota would tighten up some screws with the new GS, they just might hit paydirt. Then again, Infiniti probably will do well with the M as well.
 
But the thing that I keep on forgetting is that a lot of people (who don't research cars) would pick an E-Class or a 5 Series automatically. Lexus needs to prove that they can have a degree of sportiness not as extreme as BMW's, but at least able to throw about.
 
The main problem I have with Infiniti is that the styling of their cars is odd. Not bad, but the new M looks a lot like the G. Also, Infiniti does not have the reliability record that Lexus does. If you were a little old lady and had a bit of money, would you pop for a GS or an M?
 
GS is my guess.
#1178 of 3068
by clpurnell
Jan 27, 2005 (2:51 pm)
Reply
"If you were a little old lady and had a bit of money, would you pop for a GS or an M?"
 
Exactly why I wouldn't buy a Lexus. Why would I as a young professional want to drive the same car as a an old lady? When I tested the RX vs FX that is exactly why I bought the FX. The RX was just all around too soft. The only cars that Lexus makes that I like are the GS and LS. If they wussify the GS by bringing over the underpowered 3.0 they will again lose another 40k+ of my dollars and I will be driving a new M

Messages Page 118 of 307
1
...
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
...
307
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement